🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.