🔗 Share this article

Some Fortnite players are feeling disappointed, and this isn't due to recent in-game events. The game's newest mini-season, which brings a Springfield world, has also rolled out a fresh mechanic known as pets. It's impossible to deny that the new pets are cute. But, the attached prices have left many fans stunned at this developer's attempts to monetize nearly every aspect of the gaming experience.

Understanding Companion Pets?

Companions are basically like digital creatures, though with a few drawbacks. Players can name them, and these pets will accompany you throughout a match. These sidekicks are immortal, and players can pet them. Other gamers not in the player's squad cannot see sidekicks — and showing off your animal friends is arguably half the enjoyment of having them. Pets can be customized with outfits and gestures, but the controversy centers on their looks. Each sidekick's main design can only be changed one time, after which that selection becomes final. Players can choose a sidekick's coat color, secondary colors, iris tones, markings, and its build size.

A Costly Customization Mechanism

If a player afterward choose that they'd like your pet to appear slightly altered, you cannot just continue to modify the appearance. Players must purchase another companion. Furthermore, these pets are not cheap. The majority of players are getting the banana-themed pet, since it's included with this season's reward track. According to leaks, upcoming sidekicks may cost from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; for reference, 1,000 V-Bucks costs $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks cost $22.99. However, players can change the name of a companion whenever they want.

Community Reaction and Parallels

The majority of pets have not been formally released so far, so the pricing may well change. Yet even if the developer makes sidekicks more affordable, a lot of the anger comes from the fact that players could have to pay for a single kind of pet more than once. For some, the pricing scheme seems especially unfair when the developer has already added pets that ride about inside backpack accessories. Backpack pets do not have a restriction on changes and are visible by fellow players in the game. Back bling pets can't be given a name or use emotes, but opposing gamers can sometimes interact with them — which is more favorable than being invisible altogether.

Lack of unique features and limited interaction choices have many gamers feeling disappointed. Why can't a player, such as, interact playfully with their stylish fruit-themed pet? A few note that companions sometimes fail to stay close with the player if a game is fast-paced, or mention that the banana pet occupies two spots in the reward system — and this supports the idea that the developer is squeezing players for revenue. Greedy is a word that's coming up often in these discussions, with a number of comparing sidekick monetization to other aggressive monetization models in titles like EA Sports FC. Additionally, it doesn't help that certain sidekicks are expected to be more expensive than equivalent outfit versions.

"PLEASE do not purchasing Sidekicks," pleads a popular community thread that advises fellow gamers to proverbially vote with their wallets.

"I know these pets are adorable," the post continues, "I know they're fun. We are aware everyone has been looking forward to them. However the greed on display is unacceptable and should not be supported."

A Broader Picture of Virtual Spending

In recent years, Fortnite's events and partnerships have grown in scope and ambition, but the no-cost-to-start game still needs to earn income. Therefore, the sheer quantity of cosmetics users can now buy has become almost excessive. In addition to standard items like back blings, deployment tools, pickaxes, and gestures, players might possibly use cash on shoes, songs, instruments, Lego pieces, vehicles, wheels, vehicle drift colors, battle passes, and a membership. Sidekicks not only cost payment, and also bring in a range of fresh revenue avenues for the company. Presumably, users will soon be in a position to pay for items like pet looks, outfits, gestures, and additional interaction features.

All of such customization items are completely voluntary and unneeded to enjoy the game, but gear can nonetheless influence your community experience. Younger players, for example, sometimes face teasing for using flashy enough outfits. A comparable situation also occurred when the company introduced brand-name shoes, which can range from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The shoe pricing scheme wasn't popular as well, and a few fans promised that they wouldn't succumb to the pressure back then. But ultimately, purchasing shoes became commonplace. Now, sidekicks are additionally pushing the limits of how much a player could be prepared to pay to stand out within the crowd.

What is Next for Sidekicks?

Pets are still a relatively recent feature, and they exist a title that updates regularly. A few fans are reporting that they've gotten a questionnaire that gauges how people feel about sidekick mechanics and pricing, and this might potentially mean that the developer's strategy are still fluid. But if Fortnite footwear are any indication, companions probably will not become more affordable in general — instead, there may be a wider range of prices to shop.

Ultimately, where some individuals are expressing anger at Fortnite shop prices, different players are experiencing nothing but happiness for their new competitive pals.